Standards Development
ISO/IEC processes, NWIPs, committee liaison. Building the governance layer markets need.
Evidence-based transparency for the AI era.
Privacy policies are not transparency. Transparency Lab builds the standards, audits, and infrastructure that make data governance inspectable and enforceable.
Four practices, one through-line: make transparency something you can inspect, verify, and enforce — not something an organisation merely claims.
ISO/IEC processes, NWIPs, committee liaison. Building the governance layer markets need.
Regulator-grade evidence reviews. Transparency that can survive enforcement decisions.
CIR, notice.txt, transparency badges. The technical layer that makes notice verifiable.
For privacy officers, developers, and standards contributors who need systems that can be inspected.
Claimed transparency is worthless. Evidence-based, inspectable transparency is the only kind that supports trust or enforcement.
The world needs a visible signal for data — the way a sign on the land tells you where you stand. The analogy is the Forest Charter: a public, legible mark that told you the boundary of what was private.
What we call Trustparency is that signal for digital systems. Not a privacy policy. Not a checkbox. A machine-readable, independently verifiable record that a notice was issued, at this version, at this time — and that the data was collected under a declared legal basis.
The difference between clean AI and dirty AI is whether that record exists.
A three-session practice space for transparency & consent standards — live, in Toronto.
The world needs a visible signal for data — the way a sign on the land tells you where you stand. This summer, Transparency Lab is running three small, applied sessions at the Centre for Social Innovation in Toronto.
What is the difference between AI that has consent lineage and AI that doesn't — and why does it matter in practice? Half structured presentation, half open facilitated discussion.
Hands-on. Work directly with a First-Factor Notice (1FN) — a Controller Identification Record, a notice.txt, and a transparency badge — applied to a real scenario. A transparency signal runs live in the room.
The transparency signal works live in a real space. A notice is issued, a receipt is downloadable, rights are visible. We invite a wider group to react and decide what comes next.
| Single session | $150 |
|---|---|
| Full series | $350 |
| CSI member · single | $100 |
| CSI member · series | $280 |
| Scholarship | On request |
Spaces are limited to 5–10 co-researchers per session.
Scholarship / sliding scale available — email us.
Your registration contributes directly to applied standards development. You are a co-researcher, not an attendee.
Practitioner prototype labs for CSI members and 225IEG digital transformation practitioners — build directly with the transparency infrastructure, not just learn about it.
Hands-on prototyping for CSI members and 225IEG practitioners. Work directly with the running stack: notice receipts, data trust governance, and the Priv8AI personal control interface. In-person at CSI with live remote participation.
Buy Ticket →Second iteration of the Hub prototype. Fix what broke, extend what worked, and stress-test the CSI Data Trust governance model with live cases from 225IEG members. New remote participants welcome alongside the returning cohort.
Buy Ticket →The transparency and consent standard at the heart of this work has been in development for roughly twenty years — through ISO/IEC processes, Council of Europe liaison roles, and interoperability standards bodies.
Consent record standard. The technical anchor for machine-readable notice and consent.
Proposed ISO/IEC standard for digital transparency and the Universal Notice Receipt Protocol. In active development through SC 27 WG5.
Liaison contributor on digital transparency and AI governance. Next presentation: June 2026 plenary.
Standards work by Transparency Lab / Interoperability Expert Group (225ieg.org)
For organisations that need to demonstrate accountability — not just claim it.
Digital transparency strategy, AI governance review, notice and consent architecture for organisations that need to demonstrate accountability, not just claim it.
Standards contribution, comment submissions, gap analysis against ISO/IEC frameworks. For organisations engaging with SC 27, SC 44, or Council of Europe processes.
Regulator-grade training for privacy officers, standards contributors, and developers. Applied, scenario-based, tied to live standards.
Get in touch
info@transparencylab.ca →